New data shows that nineteen teaching hospitals and 11,016
physicians in CT received payments from drug and device manufacturers last
year. Open Payments, the
searchable federal data source, was created by the Affordable Care Act which
requires that drug and device manufacturers disclose payments to physicians and
teaching hospitals. While every CT hospital received some funds, Yale-New
Haven, Hartford and CT Children’s Medical Center together received 72% of the $8.34
million state total for last year. The payments to hospitals were for both
research projects and grants. Nationally physicians and teaching hospitals were
paid $6.5
billion by drug and device makers. Physicians working in nuclear medicine
received the highest average among specialties. It’s easy to search Open Payments to
learn if and how much your doctor or hospital was paid.
Thursday, June 30, 2016
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
Hartford Courant highlights SIM conflicts of interest impact, ethics law loophole
Today’s Hartford
Courant includes a deep dive into instances of steering committee members getting
grants and changing policies to benefit their interests. Unfortunately SIM
falls into a loophole
in CT law that exempts its members from the state Code
of Ethics for Public Officials. A bill to close that loophole cruised
through legislative committees but died in the Senate this year. As the article
points out, not only are grants not going to the best organizations and are going
to wealthy, large health care organizations that don’t need the help, but it
also creates a chilling effect on health care reform progress in Connecticut.
Outsiders have no reason to make an effort because they will not benefit; insiders
also don’t have to perform, they can feel confident that they will continue to
get grants and beneficial policy decisions.
Practical info for HUSKY parents losing coverage you won't get anywhere else
Statewide Legal Services of
Connecticut has posted practical advice for the 17,688 working parents
about to lose HUSKY coverage at the end of next month. Budget issues forced
state lawmakers to cut parents’ eligibility. Preparing for the likelihood that
many of them will become uninsured, SLSCT has drafted very consumer-friendly
fact sheets in English
and Spanish including
updating information, checking out AccessHealthCT coverage, getting doctor
appointments now, prescription refills, and talking with providers about
affording future care without coverage.
1,215 lost coverage last summer but a much larger number are
scheduled to be cut at the end of July. Of the first cohort about half were
able to keep Medicaid coverage through a different eligibility category, but
it’s expected that fewer of this summer’s cohort will be as lucky. While the
administration is labeling
the cuts a “transition” to coverage in the insurance exchange,
AccessHealthCT, only 13% of last summer’s group has been able to afford that
coverage. The remainder are very likely uninsured now.
Thursday, June 23, 2016
CSG-ERC offers Medicaid reform resources for state policymakers, including underservice protections
Medicaid is now the largest coverage
program in the nation, consuming over a quarter of state budgets, and that
share is rising at an unsustainable rate. State Medicaid programs are working
on reforms to shift from a system that rewards volume with no regard to quality
to a better system that builds value. Next week in Boston the Council of
State Governments-Eastern Region is hosting State
Medicaid Reforms: Different Models, Common Goals, a meeting of
Northeastern state Medicaid policymakers, including several from CT, to learn about best practices across the
US, available support and to share resources. CSG-ERC has posted three
backgrounders to support the meeting. The first describes
state reform models and the second outlines the
status of Medicaid reforms in ERC states including CT.
Focusing on work done in CT, the third brief gives states options
to prevent inappropriate underservice. As an income-based,
entitlement program run by states with federal support that serves members at
risk for poor health due to social determinants, Medicaid carries both unique
strengths and challenges. Unnecessary over-treatment has received a great deal
of attention as a driver of rising health costs in the wider health care
system, but inappropriate under-service is also a problem across payer sources.
As health care payment moves away from volume-based systems such as
fee-for-service to quality and risk based systems such as shared savings, the
potential for underservice grows. Federal regulations acknowledge, “Programs
that include incentives to reduce costs for care may result in unintended
consequences such as avoidance of at-risk patients, [and] “stinting” on care”. The meeting will be at the
Massachusetts State House June 29th from 10am to 4pm. Click here for
more
info and registration.
Thursday, June 16, 2016
Medicaid reform application released – good interest at bidder’s conference
CT Medicaid’s plan for payment reform marked a milestone
last week with release of the RFP
for provider networks and community health centers to participate. Most of the
independent consumer advocates’ Medicaid
Study Group recommendations are included, but
not all. Pros include protective attribution, no downside risk, smart
quality incentives to reward improvement, re-investing savings in quality,
makes the questionable CCIP plan voluntary for networks, PCMH support, requires
formal consumer advisory oversight in the governance structure, and strong
language prohibiting payment of savings generated by inappropriate
underservice. The RFP reflects the Care Management Committee’s concerns about
shared savings’s potential to encourage underservice by including policies to
prevent the problem and a yet-to-be-developed robust monitoring system. The
bidder’s conference this week was well-attended by community health centers and
private ACOs with lots of specific questions. Proposals are due July 26th
for a contract start date of Jan. 1st of next year. There is still a
great deal of work to do.
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Healthcare Cabinet sets state agency context for recommendations
At yesterday’s meeting, the Healthcare Cabinet heard from ten state
agencies that all touch on health. They were asked to report on how they were
saving money, improving the quality of care, and innovating to improve the
health of state residents. DSS got twice as much time as everyone else, with
good reason. Among the impressive initiatives there were a few trends –
individualizing interventions, especially for high-cost, high-need patients,
working with communities and consumers collaboratively, making care affordable,
protecting and supporting families, targeting homelessness and ED use, using
data and evidence, and making better use of limited resources. After hearing
for months about innovations from other states, it was very helpful to hear
about promising initiatives we can build on here. This could be the beginning
of breaking down silos that have stymied progress in the past. At next month’s
meeting on July 12th we will begin working on recommendations for
reform in Connecticut.
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Medicaid Council hears about promising homelessness partnership
Friday’s Medicaid Council meeting highlighted a new
federal Medicaid-Housing Partnership opportunity for CT. The collaborative application
by CT Medicaid and six other agencies and non-profits was one of eight states
awarded. Under new federal guidance, Medicaid can cover tenancy sustaining and
transition services, such as help with identifying a home, application
assistance, help with moving, and early identification and intervention for
behaviors that may jeopardize housing. The program will help the state link those
Medicaid-funded services to other resources to pay for non-Medicaid supports.
Because of CT’s access to comprehensive Medicaid data, since moving away from
multiple MCOs, data matching with homeless data sources will allow earlier
identification and intervention to avoid costly poor health outcomes.
Sunday, June 12, 2016
FDA committee split on benefits of C. difficile treatment
Last week, the FDA’s
Antimicrobial Advisory Committee drilled deep into evidence on the safety and
effectiveness of Bezlotoxumab, a drug intended to reduce recurrence of C.
difficle infections. The evidence was extensive – slides with data tables and
charts numbered at least 1,855. Half a million Americans suffered from serious
C. diff infections and 29,000 of them died in 2011. Many patients, even after
cured of a C. diff infection have a recurrence (20 to 35%) and those patients
are at 33% higher risk of dying. Preventing C. diff recurrence is a top public
health priority. Bezlo is a new biologic drug intended to reduce the chance of
recurrence when given with antibiotics to cure the initial infection. However
the FDA and committee members voiced serious concerns over whether Bezlo could
interfere with the initial “cure”, which was unexpected, conflicting evidence
between studies of whether there was any improvement in recurrence rates with
Bezlo, and troubling rates of serious adverse events. It is important to note
that C. diff infections are more common in elderly, already fragile patients.
We heard about different definitions of the initial “cure” between the FDA and
Merck, debated why there weren’t fewer deaths in the Bezlo-treated group over
controls, and whether Bezlo could be administered after the initial antibiotic
has already worked to avoid any inference with the cure. While members
generally agreed on the concerns, we split on whether there was “substantial”
evidence of Bezlo’s safety and effectiveness. This was the first time I’ve
voted against a drug’s approval. C. diff recurrence is a serious and deadly problem,
this approach offers great potential, and there was a great deal of support for
the company working on a solution, however many
members felt the evidence wasn’t there yet. The FDA makes the final
decision.
Wednesday, June 8, 2016
27 minutes average ER wait time for Connecticut
Governing
magazine reports that in 2014 the average Emergency Room patient in
Connecticut waited 27 minutes for care. That wait is similar to neighboring
states but well below Maryland with the longest wait at 46 minutes, and well above
Colorado and Utah where patients waited only 16 minutes. The article cites CMS
Hospital Compare Data.
|
Average ER wait (2014)
|
CT
|
27 minutes
|
MA
|
37
|
RI
|
27
|
NH
|
28
|
VT
|
25
|
NY
|
24
|
NJ
|
30
|
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
CT Insurers want enormous rate hikes in 2017
Insurers in CT
have asked the Dept. of Insurance for permission to raise premiums significantly
next year, both on the exchange, AccessHealthCT, and off. Insurers want to
raise individual AccessHealthCT premiums on average by 26.8% (Anthem with 56,700
covered lives), 14.3% (ConnectiCare Benefits covering 47,597 lives) and 12.21%
(HealthyCT with 16,274 covered lives). Those averages cover a range of a 39.8%
to 13.0% for individual plans. Insurers blame rising health care costs and
expiring federal transitional reinsurance provisions. Several important points
– in the past, the Insurance Dept. has lowered insurers’ rate increases, many people
are eligible for federal income-based subsidies to help with the cost of exchange
premiums, and the exchange has indicated
an interest in negotiating
with insurers to bring premiums down. Individuals in off-exchange plans
cannot access federal subsides; insurers have requested average increases
between 6.6% and 27.9% for those plans. Small groups are facing similar
increases, both on and off the exchange. The Insurance Dept. will hold hearings on
the increases August 3 and 4 and is accepting public
comment now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)