A new poll, Inform CT Consumer Confidence Survey, finds that almost two thirds of CT residents are worried about health insurance affordability, up 12% in the last year. A new Gallup poll found that Americans’ perceptions of the health care and drug industries are the lowest among all sectors except the federal government. That means they are below oil and gas, lawyers, and advertising. These are the worst rankings either health care or pharmaceuticals have ever scored in Gallup’s poll. (The authors note that the survey was fielded before the EpiPen price story broke in the media – it could be worse). The public is getting restless about rising health costs. We need to do a much better job and use smarter tools to fix the system. Econ 101 isn’t working.
Wednesday, August 31, 2016
Monday, August 29, 2016
It’s a shame that this book is written in the style of a textbook rather than for the general public, because we all need to hear David Harker’s message. Created scientific controversies surround issues where there is broad scientific agreement but the public’s perception is that there is uncertainty and doubt. The false controversies can be very dangerous. Beliefs that tobacco has nothing to do with cancer, that vaccines cause autism, that climate change has nothing to do with human actions, and that HIV and AIDS are unrelated cause direct harm to population health, but also lower scientific literacy and undermine faith in science. The role of conflicted interests in manufacturing false controversies is infuriating but very instructive. Read more about this book and others from the CT Health Policy Project Book Club
Thursday, August 25, 2016
An article published today in the New England Journal of Medicine highlights the challenges in health reform and why the usual, simple fixes aren’t working. The article by Richard Bohmer, The Hard Work of Health Care Transformation, explains why changing financial incentives or governance structures aren’t sufficient to effect change. The status quo is very strong. It’s great to see of the fact that the usual payment reform tactics miss the point. Shifts in incentives or structures are not the goal, they can support reform but alone they are usually irrelevant distractions and, at worst, counter-productive. Change is about consistent, small changes made over time, institutionalized within organizations that build internal capacity. Payment and governance shifts should follow and support reforms -- not the other way around. There is plenty of evidence that simply changing who is at financial risk or organizational/governmental structures and counting on an invisible hand doesn’t work for health care reform.
“The short term investments that are required can be surprisingly small, because most organizations already have many of the requisite human asssets. The most substantial hurdle, it seems, is the change in mindset.”
Monday, August 15, 2016
The rising cost of health care is hitting hard across North America, both in houses of government and at home, around the kitchen table, where the cost of vital prescription drugs can too often make or break a household budget.
From 2001 to 2011, health care spending by states jumped a staggering $5.1 billion across America, an increase of 59 percent. Just as families might be forced to sacrifice a summer vacation as medical bills mount, states have cut $4 billion in spending in other vital areas like education, housing, public safety and mental health, in order to compensate for the spike in health care costs.
It’s not a sustainable model, and states are increasingly taking bold steps to attempt to normalize cost drivers, specifically prescription drug costs.
Earlier this year, Vermont became the first state in the U.S. to pass legislation requiring drug manufacturers to provide pricing justification for the biggest selling drugs in the state. And in Massachusetts, the Commonwealth’s Health Policy Commission is playing a hands-on role in improving the transparency and accountability of the health care system.
One of the major issues with prescription drug costs in America is that there’s no agency that tries to value drugs before they’re available to be marketed, according to Dan Ollendorf, chief scientific officer for the Boston-based Institute for Clinical and Economic Review.
ICER is trying to change that by advocating for value-basedanalysis of new drugs as they’re brought to the market. ICER uses an impartial benchmarking system that seeks to establish a value for each new drug based on a number of factors.
“In our reports, we try to set a level on what we think is a reasonable price,” Ollendorf said. “We try to time our reports around launch of drugs to United States so the benchmarks we present will affect negotiations over pricing.”
Ollendorf believes a third-party valuation of prescription drugs adds transparency to a process that is often shrouded in secrecy, while protecting pharmaceutical companies from being forced to share proprietary information or hindering innovation.
Sara Sadownik, Deputy Director of the Massachusetts Health Policy Commission, said controlling prescription drug costs have come into focus as it implements a new law that requires new health care costs do not outpace the state’s budget growth.
“Rising costs are not an anomaly, they’re a trend,” she said, adding projections show they’ll continue to jump in the high single digits annually over the next few years before stabilizing at a 4-6 percent annual jump.
Friday, August 5, 2016
In the last few days several sources have released hospital quality rankings and measures. The bottom line -- CT’s hospitals have a lot of work to do.
CMS released their long-awaited five star system for hospital ratings, but no CT hospitals received five stars. In fact, only one earned four stars (Backus), 17 received three stars, 9 got two stars and one (Danbury) only received one star.
According to CMS and Kaiser Health News, Medicare has penalized 19 of CT’s 28 hospitals every year for high readmission rates since the program began five years ago. Interestingly, the highest penalty for readmissions in this round goes to Yale-New Haven, who has applied to acquire Lawrence and Memorial, with the lowest penalty.
Our Basics of CT’s Health System has been updated for 2016. It addresses private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, the uninsured, health care financing, reform and where CT stands. The primer is part of our resource collection available at cthealthbook.org.
Thursday, August 4, 2016
August’s CT Health Reform Dashboard update is again very active – and not in a good way. Thousands of working HUSKY parents lost coverage this week. SIM ethics problems continue to plague reform efforts. Efforts to bypass DSS’s prudent evaluation of the new, untested, very ambitious Medicaid reform plan are disturbing. Consultants for the Health Care Cabinet have recommended a troubling plan for reform that misses what is working in CT. Yale-New Haven’s health system wants to get even bigger, risking monopoly power and price increases we can’t afford.
Wednesday, August 3, 2016
Test your knowledge of top salaries at CT’s hospitals and health systems. Take the August CT Health Policy Web Quiz.
Monday, August 1, 2016
Our CT Health Policy Project website has been down for an unacceptable length of time. (I know some of you feel our pain.) Be assured we are working furiously on a solution – both short and long-term. We apologize for any inconvenience. If there is something you are looking for, please let us know at firstname.lastname@example.org. (That’s still working).