The troubling news: To get the federal grant, SIM leaders
believe they need to be more aggressive in Medicaid payment reform and have
proposed a shared savings model to cover over 200,000 members starting Jan. 1,
2016. There are very
few details on the proposal and committee members had a lot of questions.
Consumer advocates raised significant concerns both in public
comments and during the meeting. Concerns focused on an 1115 waiver with a
global cap on federal reimbursements, HSAs for Medicaid members, reductions in
current fees to providers but potential future savings payments, the lack of
time and vetting through councils and committees for the proposal, and undertreatment/incentives
to deny necessary care. Doubts have also been raised about SIM’s
assertion that they must include radical Medicaid payment reforms to secure
a successful SIM grant. Advocates
noted that earlier successful SIM states’ Medicaid reforms followed a
natural progression of ongoing reforms in those more mature states. And we’ve
known about their plans for over a year. CT has a poor history with similar Medicaid
incentives. Since CT Medicaid
moved away from capitation in HUSKY to one focused on PCMHs, health
outcomes are better, provider participation is up, and per person health costs
are down.