Today a
letter was sent to state SIM planners from 24 CT consumer advocates
representing 21 organizations proposing an alternative to the state’s proposed SIM
plan. The SIM project, funded with a $3m federal grant, is developing payment
and care delivery models for at least 80% of state residents – 3 million people
or more and $30 billion in CT health spending. Advocates
are concerned that the decision-making groups lacked consumer input, and
that the process was largely conducted out of public view over a short few
months in the summer. The plan includes a controversial plan to shift financial
risk onto providers. The state now intends to apply for up to $60m in federal
funding to implement the model. In the letter, advocates affirmed our support
for the concept – to improve quality and access to care, while controlling
costs. But advocates also urged policymakers to build a meaningful, feasible
quality monitoring system for CT, in an inclusive process engaging all
stakeholders, including consumers and advocates. It is critical that this
quality system be working and in place, before
any provider risk incentives attach. Advocates are optimistic that this
alternative will serve the goals of the SIM project but will also protect
consumers from savings generated by withholding appropriate care as opposed to
the intended reductions in unnecessary care and duplication of services.