The troubling news: To get the federal grant, SIM leaders
believe they need to be more aggressive in Medicaid payment reform and have
proposed a shared savings model to cover over 200,000 members starting Jan. 1,
2016. There are very
few details on the proposal and committee members had a lot of questions.
Consumer advocates raised significant concerns both in public
comments and during the meeting. Concerns focused on an 1115 waiver with a
global cap on federal reimbursements, HSAs for Medicaid members, reductions in
current fees to providers but potential future savings payments, the lack of
time and vetting through councils and committees for the proposal, and undertreatment/incentives
to deny necessary care. Doubts have also been raised about SIM’s
assertion that they must include radical Medicaid payment reforms to secure
a successful SIM grant. Advocates
noted that earlier successful SIM states’ Medicaid reforms followed a
natural progression of ongoing reforms in those more mature states. And we’ve
known about their plans for over a year. CT has a poor history with similar Medicaid
incentives. Since CT Medicaid
moved away from capitation in HUSKY to one focused on PCMHs, health
outcomes are better, provider participation is up, and per person health costs
are down.
Friday, June 27, 2014
SIM update: PCMH standards affirmed but rushing into a radical Medicaid payment change
The good news: At yesterday’s meeting the SIM steering
committee voted to accept their workgroup’s
recommendation to use NCQA national standards, with some CT-specific
additions, as the
patient-centered medical home (PCMH) standard for the SIM glide path program.
SIM will work with NCQA to develop the additional standards, possibly to
include oral and behavioral health integration and cultural/linguistic
standards. New practices, without any PCMH certification, will be offered
support to achieve the new NCQA Plus standards. Existing PCMHs will not be
affected by the decision.