The SIM
steering committee reviewed final recommendations from their work groups
yesterday. The SIM project is developing payment and care delivery models for
at least 80% of state residents – 3 million people or more and $30 billion in
CT health spending. The recommendations are very detailed and specific, but
they maintain that there is still an opportunity for revision. Advocates are
concerned that the decision-making groups lacked consumer input, and that the
process was largely conducted out of public view over a short few months in the
summer. The state intends to apply for up to $60m in federal funding to
implement the plan. Most troubling, the
plan includes moving 80% of state residents into a total-cost-of-care payment
model within 5 years. Total-cost-of-care gives providers “responsibility for
the value of patient care by tying a portion of payment to achievement of total
cost and quality metrics.” It could include “gain sharing, full risk sharing,
and/or capitation.” Proponents acknowledge that CT does not now have the
monitoring infrastructure to ensure that savings are not achieved by denying
appropriate care. Advocates are urging the state for a plan modification that
requires a meaningful quality monitoring system be in place before any provider
risk dollars attach. It is also critical that any incentive payments (or
capitation withholds) be contingent on meeting meaningful, not minimal, quality
standards. CT is well behind other states in capacity to measure
quality and in performance. SIM leaders do intend to create a metrics
workgroup to develop quality standards. Hopefully this is a more diverse,
transparent committee with all stakeholders represented.
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Access Health CT rates up sharply, CID review and competition helped
Today’s CT Health Insurance Exchange/Access Health CT board
meeting included a report from Wakely actuaries hired by the exchange to review
rate proposals from health plans applying to offer coverage in the exchange.
According to Wakely, plans have filed numerous revisions lowering their rate
proposals, largely in response to each other and questions from the CT
Insurance Dept. in their review. Despite that, in contrast to many other state
exchanges, unsubsidized rates will be rising sharply from this year’s level. In
examples comparing 2013 premiums with 2014 for five consumer examples, impact
varied considerably. For example, single males age 21 not eligible for
subsidies (over $45,900 annual income) can expect premiums to more than double
for a bronze plan. Half the examples of people eligible for modest subsidies
will also see their premiums rise, also more than doubling for that single
young man now at 350% of the Federal Poverty Level. However some consumers
eligible for the most generous subsidies, may see no premiums. While
assumptions the rates are based on vary widely between plans, the final rates
are remarkably similar with fairly little price difference between plans. Most
plans that will be offered on the exchange are bronze level (covering 60% of
medical costs on average). Of the individual coverage examples given by Wakely,
the lowest premium cost was from Aetna in 14 of 15 examples.
In other news, the exchange announced they have hired a
director for the All Payer Claims Database, Tamim Ahmed, PhD Economics. He has
experience in data analysis and risk adjusting rates.
Monday, July 29, 2013
ConnectiCare withdraws SHOP exchange proposal
ConnectiCare
has notified Access Health CT, our state’s health insurance exchange, that
they are withdrawing their proposal to participate in the SHOP exchange. This
leaves only three insurers in the small business portion of the exchange –
Anthem, United and HealthyCT. ConnectiCare still intends to participate in Access
Health CT’s individual exchange along with Anthem, HealthyCT, and Aetna. The
SHOP exchange is expected to enroll approximately 40,000 people, far less than
the 200,000
or more people expected to enroll in individual exchange coverage.
Saturday, July 27, 2013
An ACA primer for CT
Arielle Levin Becker of the CT Mirror has drafted a sensible,
brief FAQ
on health reform, what is coming in January and what it means for people
who don’t read Health Affairs for a living. She has done an expert job of
distilling the confusion into an accessible resource. Thank you Arielle.
Friday, July 26, 2013
HealthyCT lowers rates in insurance exchange
Healthy CT, the new co-op insurer created with federal support
under the ACA, has revised
their proposed premiums for the CT Health Insurance Exchange, Access Health
CT. The new rates, much lower than their competitors, will average $271 per
month for individuals and $408 for small businesses. Those individual rates
will vary between $111 and $1,080 based on age, geography and which plan they
choose. Competing plan premiums will average $364 to $424 monthly. HealthyCT’s
lower individual premiums, down 36% from their original proposal, resulted from
new data about the likely health of enrollees in the exchange.
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Medicaid Council update
Last Friday’s Medicaid
Council meeting focused on ACA primary care rate increases for 2,277 CT providers
including MDs practicing pediatrics, internal medicine, family medicine and
some specialties and APRNs for preventive care services. Effective January 1st
but implemented July 1st, the ACA increased these rates to Medicare
levels, with 100% federal funding through 2014. On average, rates are almost
doubling,;for example rates for code 99203 - new patient visit will rise from
$66.40 to $123.53. The rate
increases are significant, impressive and universally welcomed by Council
members. However hesitations about fully realizing the impact in increased CT provider
Medicaid participation were raised concerning the delay in implementing the increase,
and lingering administrative
challenges. CT ranks fourth
lowest among states in physicians taking new Medicaid patients. Council
members urged the state to track increases in provider participation before and
after the rate increases.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)