The SIM
steering committee reviewed final recommendations from their work groups
yesterday. The SIM project is developing payment and care delivery models for
at least 80% of state residents – 3 million people or more and $30 billion in
CT health spending. The recommendations are very detailed and specific, but
they maintain that there is still an opportunity for revision. Advocates are
concerned that the decision-making groups lacked consumer input, and that the
process was largely conducted out of public view over a short few months in the
summer. The state intends to apply for up to $60m in federal funding to
implement the plan. Most troubling, the
plan includes moving 80% of state residents into a total-cost-of-care payment
model within 5 years. Total-cost-of-care gives providers “responsibility for
the value of patient care by tying a portion of payment to achievement of total
cost and quality metrics.” It could include “gain sharing, full risk sharing,
and/or capitation.” Proponents acknowledge that CT does not now have the
monitoring infrastructure to ensure that savings are not achieved by denying
appropriate care. Advocates are urging the state for a plan modification that
requires a meaningful quality monitoring system be in place before any provider
risk dollars attach. It is also critical that any incentive payments (or
capitation withholds) be contingent on meeting meaningful, not minimal, quality
standards. CT is well behind other states in capacity to measure
quality and in performance. SIM leaders do intend to create a metrics
workgroup to develop quality standards. Hopefully this is a more diverse,
transparent committee with all stakeholders represented.