An update on the SIM
project was the main agenda item at yesterday’s Health Care Cabinet
meeting. At last month’s meeting, members were asked to collect feedback on SIM
proposals for payment and delivery reform to cover 80% of CT residents. The SIM committee is planning to set payment
and delivery models for the state by Sept. 1st and apply to the
federal government for a $40 to 60 million grant to the state to implement the
models they are deciding on now. The proposal centers on provider risk-sharing,
including total cost of care models (capitation) which elicited grave concerns
among advocates. Capitation has a very troubled history in CT. When capitation
in the HUSKY program was eliminated, savings
were significant, provider recruitment, utilization, access to care and
care coordination improved and patient-centered medical homes were launched. CT
is also behind other states in being able to measure quality or access to care
– if the payment reform is harmful to people as advocates fear, we won’t know
it and we won’t be able to do much about it. The SIM committees include no
consumer advocates among the 75 members but state agencies, insurance industry
and provider groups are very well-represented. Concerns were also related from
advocates who are troubled that a very small group of people, no matter how well-intentioned,
are making very large decisions for our state very quickly, largely out of
public view. This is in contrast to the very successful health neighborhood
project by DSS for people eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid that was
developed in an open, deliberative process and resulted in overcoming all
stakeholder reservations to earn universal support. Advocates asked that the
process be opened and that we take more time to be sure we build a reform plan
that engages the wisdom among all stakeholders, especially consumers, and has
every chance to be successful. Advocates will be sharing their concerns
formally in a letter to the SIM leaders.